Salmon Fishing in the Yemen is a romantic fantasy with some
attractive A-list stars. But even the beauty and talents of Ewan McGregor,
Emily Blunt, and Kristin Scott Thomas can’t save this muddled film.
Simon Beaufoy, the screenwriter, has done some pretty good
stuff in the past, including The Full Monty (1997), Miss Pettigrew Lives For A
Day (2008) and Slumdog Millionaire (2008), but this story is not only silly,
but as misbegotten as the ludicrous idea that an extraordinarily rich, British
educated Yemeni Sheikh (Amr Waked) could create an environment conducive to
spawning salmon in the deserts of the Arabian peninsula, and that otherwise
sensible, intelligent people would go along with it. To be fair, pretty much every character in
the movie declares that the salmon breeding/fishing idea is farfetched, but
this is done in order to create a sort of childlike fantasy mood that anything
can happen if, like Wendy in Peter Pan, you just believe. The trouble is, this is not a kids’ movie.
Setting this tale in the modern Middle East in general and
Yemen in particular is problematical. The story derives from a comic novel of
the same name, which was published in 2007, before the political unrest of the
last couple of years (although there has been periodic unrest in Yemen for the
last twenty years). On the other hand, the producers of the motion picture must
have been aware of the recent Yemeni civil war, al Qaeda activity, etc.; and I
actually found insulting the filmmakers’ assumption that I wouldn’t know or
that I’d just suspend my disbelief no matter how dumb the premise.
Beaufoy’s script tries to anticipate this sort of criticism,
much as he anticipated the absurdity of the whole fishing idea by having
characters acknowledge that fact. So there’s a little bump in the plot about
cartoonish Arabs trying to assassinate the prince, but such references to the
fraught political situation are so clumsy and slight as to undermine rather
than gird the reality depicted. By way of apology, he also has a character
explain, "We need a good story about the Middle East that
doesn't have explosions."
I guess it’s just supposed to be a “feel good” picture about
a modern land of Arabian nights and dreams that might come true. But for me, the net impression was pretty
much the contrary - like eating too much candy: it’s nice at first to taste all
the sugar, but then you tire of that and are left with sticky lips and fingers,
an annoyed stomach, and a feeling of regret that you engaged in the activity at
all. This feeling is abetted by a rather tepid, clunky, almost nineteenth
century romance between McGregor, as a button down, somewhat nerdy character,
and Blunt, as a young professional
woman, who does not appear to have any actual profession. Adding to the cotton
candy, fairy tale quality of the story is the character of the Sheikh – a
handsome, charming, “visionary” benevolent dictator who only wants what’s best
for his people.
On the plus side (!), the cinematography is lovely, and the
actors do the best they can with the material at hand. Also, Ewan McGregor and
Emily Blunt are quite nice to look at. [Despite this clunker, Emily remains well ensconced on
the girlfriend list.] Director Lasse Halstrom [Cider House Rules (1999),
Chocolat (2000)] keeps the predictable plot moving along.
Still, there are better fluff movies around, and superior
ways to spend your time.
Available on DVD and
Blueray from Netflix, or for streaming at Amazon Instant Video.
despite your pan, most of which I agree with, I found it a perfectly good movie to watch on a transatlantic flight.
ReplyDeleteI can see that. It is certainly pleasant and pretty.
Delete