The 2013 installment in the Woody Allen oeuvre, Blue
Jasmine, is an entertaining picture, with a must-see, dazzling performance
by its star, Cate Blanchett, as its main character, Jasmine French. Written and directed by Allen, Blue
Jasmine’s inspiration, or at least its source material, would appear to be A Streetcar Named Desire (1947 play
and/or 1951 movie), amalgamated with the Bernie Madoff fraud scandal, and more
specifically the character or circumstances of Madoff’s wife, Ruth.
The story is pretty simple: Jasmine was married to Hal, a
flamboyant New York financial tycoon, whose life and fortune came crashing down
when it was revealed, a la Madoff, that he was a scam artist and a fraud. Now penniless, Jasmine arrives in San
Francisco to move in with her working class sister, Ginger (Sally Hawkins), in
her modest, hard-scrabble apartment, hoping to regroup and put her life back
together. This is not unlike the trajectory of Ruth Madoff (who moved in with
her sister in Florida).
Jasmine is a superficial, over-privileged, narcissistic
bitch, who swans around, recalling the glory of her former wealth, lording it over Ginger, criticizing her ordinariness, and disparaging her grease-monkey boyfriend, Chili (the wonderful, Bobby Cannavale) and Chili’s friends. This situation leads to domestic difficulties, of course, not unlike those in Streetcar between the hard-to-take Blanche,
sympathetic Stella, and earthy, virile Stanley Kuwalsky. Allen has a much lighter
touch than Tennessee Williams, and much of this stuff is played for laughs, or
at least ironic smiles.
Like Williams’ Blanche DuBois, Allen’s Jasmine French is a
great, intriguing, ultimately self-destructive mess of a character. Both of these women are running from the
past, both have developed enveloping fantasies about who they are, conflating
external circumstances (attractive appearance, past wealth, connections with
powerful men) for a jarringly false sense of self-worth. Blanche was alcoholic,
Jasmine pops Xanax like candy, and for the same purpose – to escape from the
terrible here and now. Both, as it turns out, are mentally ill.
Playing Blanche in Streetcar,
Vivien Leigh won the best actress Oscar in 1952. Cate Blanchett’s deep, nuanced
portrayal of the exasperating, yet fascinating Jasmine is every bit as good,
and I don’t doubt that she’ll be in contention for the prize next March. For
me, at least, she completely disappeared into this complex character – not so
easy for an actress I’ve seen so many times before.
Blanchett is reason enough to see Blue Jasmine. But
though she is the standout, a lot of the supporting cast is also terrific. One of Allen’s strengths as a writer/director
is setting up interesting, meaty situations for his actors and their
characters. And there are so many wonderful, interesting, moments in Blue
Jasmine, where the actors are allowed to shine.
Susan Hawkins plays her characterization of Ginger deftly –
creating a memorable counter weight to the flamboyant Jasmine. This is
particularly impressive, because Ginger is supposed to be just a kind-of
ordinary girl, trying to live an ordinary life, hoping for a little stability
with a decent guy and a bit of ordinary, not spectacular happiness. Hawkins
evokes our empathy, and we wind up rooting for her. She’s one of this new wave
of British actors, who can blend into an American ensemble without revealing a
trace of her mother accent.
The other characters in Blue Jasmine are more of a
mixed bag: Alec Baldwin is Hal French, the Madoff stand in, seen exclusively in
flashbacks. Hal is extremely egocentric, sleek and suave, and clearly a
villain. Baldwin does fine playing this cardboard character. Peter Sarsgard and
Louis CK as Jasmine’s and Ginger’s new love interests are OK as well, working
against thinly developed characterizations, which are not their fault.
Because the ideas behind this movie are interesting, and the
acting ensemble is superior, I left the theater feeling rather elated, high on
the experience. Also, emotionally confused – and not in a good way. As time
passed, other doubts and criticism crept in.
Allen’s screenplay and direction of Blue Jasmine emphasizes
the humorous and the ironic, notwithstanding the essentially tragic arc of
Jasmine’s journey. At the end, she is out on the street, pathetically babbling
out her fantasies and reminiscences to an imaginary friend. And then the music
comes up and, it’s a King Oliver swinging blues number from the 1920’s, a
lovely number to be sure, but too light in mood and completely out of synch with
the final scene. It’s as if Allen, a student and fan of such music, is saying,
‘hey guys, ha ha, it’s just entertainment.’ Rather than underscoring the scene,
he undercuts it. This happens time and again throughout the movie.
Allen pays little attention to some plot details, which,
regrettably, tends to reduce the credibility of his story. So, for example,
Jasmine, despite being a sophisticated twenty-first century former high society
matron, who has chaired various philanthropic and charitable committees in New
York City, claims to have absolutely no experience with computers – to the
extent that she has to take an introductory computer class, just so she can learn
enough to sign up for an online vocational course. Perhaps 77 year-old Woody
Allen doesn’t know how operate a computer, but Jasmine certainly would.
As another example, Sarsgard’s character – supposedly a
diplomat – is nothing more than a sketch, and basically makes no sense at all. This
guy just purchased a gazillion dollar unfurnished house in Tiburon, overlooking
San Francisco Bay and The City. Within a few days of meeting Jasmine, he tells
her that he is being posted to a European embassy for two or three years
(meaning he’ll leave his spanking new house), and asks her to come along and to
marry him, knowing absolutely nothing
about her. He also reveals that he
hopes to run for the senate or congress or something upon his return, despite
the fact that he doesn’t like being with people (Jasmine met him hiding out in
a side room at a party), and as far as we can tell, he has no political
qualities.
Another gripe along these lines: although set in San
Francisco, the movie has absolutely no connection to Northern California. There
are a couple street scenes and the obligatory Golden Gate Bridge view to
establish place, but as to the story or the people, nada. No Asians, no
Hispanics, no blacks, no gays. All the blue-collar types in Ginger’s crowd look
and sound like Italian-Americans from Queens or maybe the Bronx. The upper
class folks all seem to come from the Upper East Side or the Hamptons.
I don’t mean to overstate the case. Although Blue Jasmine
is not as good as it could be and ought to be, still, it’s definitely worth
seeing. Blanchett’s brilliance is reason
enough; coupled with generally wonderful performances from the rest of the
ensemble, a truly interesting premise, the shades of Streetcar Named Desire, and Woody Allen’s droll touch, you
should find this one entertaining, and perhaps moving, as well.
In general release.
No comments:
Post a Comment