Blog Archive

Monday, September 23, 2013

Three Hitchcock Gems: Vertigo, Rear Window, Strangers on a Train


Alfred Hitchcock (1899 – 1980) has been on quite a roll lately. In 2012, two biopics about him were released: Hitchcock, in which the master was portrayed (by Anthony Hopkins) in the process of conceiving and directing Psycho (1960); and The Girl, an HBO movie about Hitch’s infatuation with Tippi Hedren, during the making of The Birds (1963). Also in 2012, Sight and Sound, the international film magazine, released its list of the 50 best movies of all time, and Vertigo supplanted Citizen Kane in first place. (To be fair, Citizen Kane was still number one on the AFI list of the 100 best American films and Vertigo came in 9th, but that was six years ago, in 2007.)

Hitchcock directed more than 50 feature films during his long career, spanning from 1925 to 1976. Many are now regarded as classics, including The 39 Steps, The Lady Vanishes, Shadow Of A Doubt, Notorious, Dial M For Murder, The Man Who Knew Too Much, North by Northwest, and the aforementioned. I've seen maybe a dozen of these over the years, but this seemed a good time to take a new look. So, I watched three of Hitchcock’s best recently. I was not disappointed.

Most of Hitchcock's movies feature a strong element of suspense. Likewise, most are character studies, generally of flawed or twisted characters, in guys who initially or superficially seem relatively normal. Hitchcock knew how to draw his audience into the suspense through careful framing, frequent close-ups, and innovative devices, such as tracking shots in which the viewer sees only what the protagonist sees. One of his hallmark techniques is to let the viewer in on what is about to happen, while withholding that information from his characters, thereby building our anticipation and fear, while James Stewart or Ingrid Bergman or Janet Leigh are left clueless. Hitchcock also believed in a strong narrative structure, and as a result, all of his films move along briskly and most are highly entertaining.

Here are capsule reviews of the three classics that I’ve watched recently:


Vertigo (1958) stars James Stewart and Kim Novak. The movie plays out in two distinct acts. Superficially, Vertigo starts out as a suspenseful mystery, but about halfway through, the mystery is revealed (to us but not to James Stewart). This does not alleviate the suspense, it adds to it. Set in San Francisco and Northern California, the picture also offers those of us from the Bay Area the bonus of a time capsule travelogue around the city and region circa 1957 (albeit with a dreamlike, almost surreal, quality).

Stewart plays Scottie, a recently retired police detective. In the first ‘act,’ Scottie is hired by Gavin, an old college friend (Tom Helmore), for a surveillance job on Gavin’s wife, Madeleine (Novak), whom Gavin describes as acting strangely, obsessed by  (and possibly possessed by) the spirit of a doomed ancestor, and potentially suicidal. Although Scottie is initially skeptical, Madeleine’s beauty attracts him, and her mysterious actions intrigue him. Scotty had left the Police Department because he suffered from vertigo, and this proves his undoing in a dramatic scene when he is unable to prevent Madeleine’s fatal leap/fall from the bell tower at Mission San Juan Bautista.


In the second ‘act,’ an emotionally devastated Scottie becomes obsessed with the image of Madeleine.  He sees her facsimile everywhere. He can’t get her out of his head. Then one day he meets a girl, Judy (Novak again) who looks kind of like her. Judy, a shop girl, is less refined than Madeleine in manner and appearance – a different persona. Nevertheless, Scotty’s obsession becomes a compulsion – to be with her, to control her, to possess her, to remake her in Madeleine’s image. 

On one level a film about a particular guy’s anxieties and psychology, Vertigo is actually a commentary on the male compulsion to manipulate and control women, to mold them in accordance with their own myths and fantasies; it’s also about (some) women’s need to subvert their own desires and individuality to such fantasies in order to gain acceptance, to feel desirable and/or protected. The 1950’s milieu makes this particularly persuasive, but things may not be so different today. As is well known, Hitchcock himself was a total control freak, particularly in the fifties and sixties and particularly with respect to his female leads - the beautiful blonde stars Grace Kelly, Kim Novak, and Tippi Hedron; so there may be some introspective reveal here. Everything and everyone is being manipulated, of course. Scottie is being manipulated by Gavin and by Madeleine, Judy by Scottie (and by Gavin),  and we, the viewers, are being manipulated throughout by Hitchcock (and enjoying it, I should add).

Cinematically, Vertigo is a real treat. To visually dramatize and allow us to share the disorientation and vertiginous anxiety experienced by poor Scottie, looking down from a great height, Hitchcock and cinematographer Robert Burke developed the “dolly zoom” (now known as Vertigo Effect), which is effectively dizzying. In a 1996 restoration, the movie was visually and aurally enhanced - fabulously. It’s just beautiful to watch. The coordinated color scheme is extremely important to the mood at various moments, and the images and saturated tones really pop off the screen. The sound is so sharp, you feel like you’re in every scene.  The music by Bernard Hermann nicely underscores the mood and the drama. Watching the “new” print, I felt like I was seeing Vertigo for the first time.

Unsurprisingly, the acting also is superb. This has got to be one of Stewart’s best roles, and Kim Novak was never better. Barbara del Geddes as Scottie’s buddy, Midge, is also swell.

Whether Vertigo is the best motion picture ever made is debatable. My own view is that there’s no such thing as a singular “best” movie. But there’s no doubt that this one is in the pantheon of must-see movies. And if it’s been a decade or more since your last viewing, it’s worth revisiting.

Rear Window (1954) is another Hitchcock collaboration with James Stewart (they made four movies together, all told). Stewart plays Jeff Jeffries, a globe-trotting magazine photographer, immobilized and stuck in his New York apartment with a broken leg. Jeff passes the time looking out his window at his neighbors’ apartments, and voyeuristically imagining little plotlines for each of them. There’s the spinster Miss Lonelyhearts, the hot-bodied dancer Miss Torso, the Newlyweds, the Songwriter, etc.  As Jeff spies on his neighbors, we get to know them a little, too, and so we have multiple little developing stories and characters, with none of whom Jeff actually interacts.

But there’s also, across the way, the Salesman (Raymond Burr), who does not
appear to be getting along his complaining, invalid wife. When she disappears one day, Jeff starts to wonder why? Further observation convinces Jeff that foul play may be at work, and his preoccupation starts to become an obsession. 

Stewart is not totally alone all day. Stella (Thelma Ritter), his nurse, comes every day to clean him up, take his temperature and dispense pearls of priceless wisdom. And Jeff’s girlfriend Lisa (Grace Kelly, in a surprisingly suggestive - for her – performance) comes every afternoon to cheer him up, cuddle a bit, perhaps bring him dinner and take his mind off things. For most men, the stunningly beautiful Kelly would be distracting, to say the least. But Jeff is so consumed with the mystery across the courtyard that he barely notices her. Another visitor is the wonderful character actor, Wendell Corey, as Detective Tom Doyle, an old friend, who Jeff calls in order to share his suspicions, in the vain expectation that Doyle will agree that a crime has been
committed, and DO something about it. Instead, Det. Doyle keeps puncturing Jeff’s theories.

Nevertheless, Jeff eventually draws Lisa and Stella into his obsession.  If you haven’t seen Rear Window, I won’t spoil it for you; but, needless to say, there are twist, turns, surprises and plenty of suspense, before the lights come on. Also, wit and humor to keep the tone on the light side. And if you have seen Rear Window, it’s worth another visit.


Strangers On A Train (1951) is the one picture in this group that I hadn’t seen previously, but it’s definitely an A-list Hitchcock classic.  In fact, in some ways, Strangers is the quintessential Hitchcock movie: intense, obsessive, suspenseful, and yet entertaining. Years earlier, I tried to read the book by Patricia Highsmith (The Talented Mr. Ripley, etc.), but it was so creepy, I couldn’t finish it. The movie is creepy, too, but it didn’t get inside my head the same way.  

 The movie stars handsome Farley Granger (Rope [1948], Senso [1954]), as Guy Haines, a famous tennis player. Guy is a decent fellow, who is in love with and engaged to marry the lovely Anne (Ruth Roman), daughter of Senator Morton (Leo G. Carroll); except there’s a hitch: Guy is still married to Miriam, a nasty low-life woman, who may not “give” him a divorce. On a train one day, Guy is approached by a smarmy, overly friendly young man named Bruno (Robert Walker), who professes to be a big fan of his, and who engages Guy in unwanted conversation. During the course of their conversation, Bruno proudly volunteers his theory of the perfect crime: two strangers each agree to kill off someone on the other’s behalf. As there’d be no known connection between killer and victim, the anonymous murderers would never be caught. For example, says Bruno, I hate my father. You could easily kill him, and I’ll knock off your wife. We’ll both get what we want, and there’ll be no repercussions.

Guy finds this weird and disturbing, and wants nothing to do with Bruno or his plan. He takes his leave
and disembarks the train.  A short time later, Guy learns with alarm that Miriam has indeed been murdered. Soon, Bruno is contacting him, demanding that Guy uphold his end of the “bargain,” threatening that he’ll implicate Guy, if he doesn’t.  From here, it gets more and more sticky for Guy.

Two things hold this somewhat contrived plot together. First, there’s the brilliant and disturbing performance by Robert Walker in a signature role as Bruno, not unlike Anthony Perkins’ in the first half of Psycho. Bruno starts out as a bright, narcissistic, kind-of obnoxious guy and morphs into a sinister and creepy, psychopathic villain.  Walker himself was rather unstable and whether his private demons informed his acting or Hitchcock’s direction is hard to say, but he is damned effective as a nut-job here. There’s nothing like a good villain!

Second, there’s the pacing, tone, cinematography, and overall production and direction by Hitchcock, that keeps us pulling for and fearing for Granger’s character.  This was the first film in which Hitchcock worked with Robert Burks as his director of photography. It was a good match, and the two went on to work together on eleven additional movies, over the next thirteen years.

Granger is fine as the good guy protagonist, torn between his desire to do the right thing and to cover his ass. Kasey Rogers is a standout as the bitch wife. Even Hitchcock’s daughter, Patricia, has a small part – as the bratty little sister of  Guy’s fiancée.

All these films are available on DVD or BluRay., including from Netflix.  All are also available to stream on Amazon Instant Video.

No comments:

Post a Comment